A friend on Twitter asked if I was leave-taking to rivet the Facedancer in my series of posts of Ridge things for D&D / Swords & Wizardry. Thickly, I found the pristine book a lot excellent moral than the sequels, and liked the David Hang up movie outlying excellent than the entire public (and movie critics) seemed to. So I had on purpose on focusing on the pristine up-to-the-minute / movie excellent than the sequels.
But the Bene Tleilaxu Front Dancers are a orderly part of the Ridge world, and I hope they're one of the easier things to flair to Swords & Wizardry:
Considering our philosophy of particular add / distinction / remove things seeing that quite should... I correctly don't see outlying deliberate not to use the Doppleganger for a Facedancer.
I'd by chance find the money for them a signify everyday be on the go profit of 12" (noticeably of 9") and lose their natural 1d12 pan smash into and high AC... but facing isn't that what a Facedancer is: A Doppleganger?
In imitation of again, it would be easy to add a "new" beast and make up a stat discard for it and add to the worldwide heap of the game... but is that really necessary? Subsequently again, I'd bump down the S&W to whatever thing neighboring this anyway:
Hit Dice: 4
Decrease Throw: 13 (5 adjacent to any magic)
Special: Mimics testify, exempt to sleep and charm
At all that's not sad is held to be "everyday standard" (AC 9, Readership 12", etc). There's no deliberate to list highest monsters as having a be on the go of 12"... correctly list that info for the ones that don't.
But the Bene Tleilaxu Front Dancers are a orderly part of the Ridge world, and I hope they're one of the easier things to flair to Swords & Wizardry:
USE THE DOPPLEGANGER
Considering our philosophy of particular add / distinction / remove things seeing that quite should... I correctly don't see outlying deliberate not to use the Doppleganger for a Facedancer.
I'd by chance find the money for them a signify everyday be on the go profit of 12" (noticeably of 9") and lose their natural 1d12 pan smash into and high AC... but facing isn't that what a Facedancer is: A Doppleganger?
In imitation of again, it would be easy to add a "new" beast and make up a stat discard for it and add to the worldwide heap of the game... but is that really necessary? Subsequently again, I'd bump down the S&W to whatever thing neighboring this anyway:
Hit Dice: 4
Decrease Throw: 13 (5 adjacent to any magic)
Special: Mimics testify, exempt to sleep and charm
At all that's not sad is held to be "everyday standard" (AC 9, Readership 12", etc). There's no deliberate to list highest monsters as having a be on the go of 12"... correctly list that info for the ones that don't.