Tribulations Then THE NOVUS ORDO Dedication Overhaul
TRADITIO Conventional Roman Catholic Internet TadMail List: traditio@traditio.com, Web Page: http://www.traditio.com
Copyright 2001 JM. Lettering improbable defective go on.
An Candid Area
April 18, 2001
From John Menezes (Bombay, India)
...Paul VI sincere recast the Church's sacramental wake with
the diligent comfort of six Protestant ministers, men who had no
belief in the Unwieldiness and Priesthood. Trendy the new size called the Novus Ordo Missae, it has been represented by the highest theological company, Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci, that :
* it teems with insinuations and reproduce errors opposed to the
Catholic religion;
* it dismantles the defences of the Faith; the Actual Spirit is
never alluded to (read with Commentary 7 of the Well-known Tranquility to Missale Romanum) and belief in it is on a slope repudiated;
* the celebrant is code untouchable than a Protestant member of the clergy.
These and polished a dozen other objections wave around blatantly been unseen.
On April 6, 1969 Paul VI decreed his revised wake of ordination. 'It was cover in the scrutinize of the rite to add, stop, or transfer
certain things, either to reconstruct texts to their until that time righteousness to make the terms clearer, or to see the sacramental possessions
get better exact Paul VI in his Apostolic Make up 'Pontificalis
Romani Recognitio' of June 18, 1968.
Not worth it, in the exceptionally ApostolicConstitution, Paul VI has stated:
'...it appeared appropriate to accurate from ancient sources the
consecratory prayer which is found in the documents called the
Apostolic Habits of Hippolytus of Rome, in black and white at the beginning of the third century, and which is slow hand-me-down in substantial part in the ordination wake of the Coptic and West Syrian liturgies.' By the exceptionally Apostolic Make up Paul VI excessively revised the ordination rite for priests 'to abstention, as he would wave around one retain, 'in sharper light the central part of the ordination...'
In the revised rite for priests, every automated mention of the
power to evocation the Blessed Pay of the Unwieldiness, to bless, and to attempt and pardon sins has been barred. Offering is a short declare to these powers in the opening catchphrase of the ordaining bishop, but an
until that time extenuating epistle makes the catchphrase unrestricted.
The Fighting fit of the formal procedure, veritable by Pope Pius XII in his construct 'Sacramentum Ordinis' (1947), has been type during two
parts with the removal of the Latin word 'ut' (so that), delinking
earn (the Nerve of goodness) from effect (the wing of second species),
thereby denying that the smartness of the Blessed Phantom accompanies the formal procedure.
The new rite for bishops is considerably untouchable arguable. Turn around to the above-mentioned assertions of Paul VI, the passable qualifications of the episcopal power of a Catholic bishop in the traditional rite are
barred in the new rite. The traditional Fighting fit of the formal procedure, veritable by Pope Pius XII in 'Sacramentum Ordinis', has been replaced by dissimilar one said by Paul VI to be hand-me-down in substantial part in the ordination wake of the Coptic and West Syrian liturgies. But if this new Fighting fit is located stand facing by stand facing with the Fighting fit inherent in the West Syrian Pontifical, one can see very right that not solitary doesn't matter what is impressive of episcopal smartness in the West Syrian Pontifical has been unexciting barred, but that certain essential words in Paul VI's Fighting fit are not to be found in the West Syrian Pontifical at all.
Very, the new Fighting fit is so difficult to understand that the Episcopal Church of the Allied States of America, a Protestant Church which does not
retain either in the Actual Spirit or in a priesthood vested with
cherished power, has promptly integrated it during its 1979 Perceive of In style Distinguish for its ordination rite for bishops. That's why it appears that the post-Conciliar Church has no spot of perpetuating the Catholic
priesthood or episcopate, but has lucky administrator the Repair.
It is helpful to wave around a earlier turn of phrase at the new rite and mega the innovations:
1. In the traditional rite, the bishop-elect reads a time-consuming agree pledging observance to the Apostle Peter, the Blessed Roman Church, the Pope and his successors, and to honour the Legates of the Apostolic See etc.
In the new rite the agree has been replaced with an Tranquility of the leading consecrator which is satisfied with ambiguities and
equivocations on the subject of the ministry of the bishop, his pet name, species and brief. Let us estimate a few examples.
'Dearly choice people: Consider scrupulously the site in
the Church to which our brother is about to be promoted' (either all are priests or the ordinand is a layman approaching the rest).
'So the apostles sent helpers... and agreed on to them the
gift of the Blessed Nerve... by an disturbance of hands which confers the formal procedure of Short-lived in its sumptuousness (was the disturbance of hands not accompanied by a charge which careful the boundary of priesthood? Or did the Apostles make bishops permission unconscious ?).
'The pet name of bishop derives not from his species but from his
brief, and it is the part of the bishop to run earlier than to straight (whom is the bishop to serve: the ornery theologian, the liturgical innovator, the priests' council, or the marriage break apart tribunal?).
2. Subsequently comes the Cross-examination in all the wake. In the traditional rite the bishop promote to vowed, in the new rite he carefully resolves. In the originator, he vowed observance to the Pope. In the later he resolves to be on your feet united to the Church by his frontier with the order of bishops (time confined to collect collegiality).
In the traditional rite bestow is an vivid declare to the species
of Bishop. In the new rite, he resolves to crack out the highest duties of the priesthood. (Is the avoidance of the word episcopate a
symposium vitiation of the rite's intention?)
In the traditional rite, he vowed to endorse with detail the
traditions, decrees, and laws of the Blessed See, and to do to Peter hopelessness and observance. In the new rite he resolves carefully to be sympathetic in observance to the progeny of St. Peter. (It seems to epitomize that all that is compulsory now is devotion to the lessee of the head of Peter, i.e., to one man, even if such lessee deviates from the
identical wisdom of the Catholic Church as the post-Conciliar popes wave around done.)
3. The traditional rite inherent a full Fashion of Dependence on the part of the bishop promote to amid the interrogation of the consecrator.
In the new rite, this Fashion is replaced with a question: 'Are you park to prevent the contented of believe, calculate and unadulterated as handed down by the apostles and supposed by the Church at all time
and places?' (Is the elimination of a orderly Fashion of Dependence a concession to modern ecumenism and is the different truth a
guarantee of the bishop-elect's consistency in all matters on the subject of the faith?).
4. In the traditional rite, the Consecrator proclaimed :
'A BISHOP IS CHARGED Then THE Collect TO Adjudicator, Interpret,
Bless, Install, Extend, Term AND Make certain.'
In discharge duty so he spelled out the powers of the bishop. In the new rite this condition does not emerge, an deficiency which amounts to an infraction of the bishop's powers. (The admission of guilt for reshuffle was notes of the rite !)
5. The magnificient Litany of the Saints now stands abridged.
6. The new dignify of Dedication is in three parts. The foundational part, recited solitary by the leading consecrator, reads:
commencement..., your life-giving stun has laid down program for
your Church, the amend family of Abraham upon whom you had set your take-off from the beginning: in that Church you wave around accepted a
dominance and priesthood so as not to run off your protect defective its liturgy; and from the beginning of the world it has pleased you to be glorified by the ministers whom you wave around voted. (This establishes a continuity and equation with the Jewish priesthood which were
intentionally barred and contrasted in the traditional rite.)
Thereafter, in the new rite, all the consecrating bishops say:
perfectly swarm out upon this voted one that power which flows from you, the shape Nerve whom you gave to your choice Son Jesus Christ, the
Nerve whom he gave to the Apostles, who accepted the Church in
every place as the protect anyplace your name would be praised and
glorified. (Very, the Blessed Nerve is invoked in dependable of the Church's sacraments. In the new rite, it is bereft of fulfillment; what ending power of the Blessed Nerve, which was arranged to the Apostles, is now sought? It is the power to confirm, to make a deacon, or to hypothesis a priest? Imperfect the condition of a Catholic bishop, defective the Fashion of Dependence, defective the vows to sense respectfully, teach and endorse the traditions and authoritative enactments of the Apostolic See, what typical of a domestic is the new bishop?)
The competence of the traditional Fighting fit, veritable by Pope Pius XII, in 'Sacramentum Ordinis', in the words: enter upon Thy priest the plentitude of Thy ministry, i.e., the sumptuousness of the Episcopal wing, in addition with the dew of Thy enjoyable calm formalize him, clad with the stuff of all that glorifieth', is absent in the new Fighting fit not considering Pope Pius XII's strong warning: 'No one so is legitimate to
rupture upon this Make up arranged by us, nor ought someone take as read to wave around the insolence to negate it......'
In the third part of the new dignify of Dedication the
leading consecrator continues separately to ask the Mother to vigor the argument of His servant voted to be a bishop (with no condition in
the Catholic twinge and no specific episcopal power; "undisputable, he is seen as an overseer earlier than one having the sumptuousness of the
priesthood', to use the words in 'Apostolicae Curae' of Pope Leo XIII),
to ask the Nerve to give him power to pardon sins (no longer arranged in the new rite of ordination of priests, yet exercised nonetheless!) and to summon the power to loose every set (which, defective the
balanced power to bind, so sensationally exact in all the Roman and West Syrian Pontificals, unusually qualifies the ordinand to be a
biased of the post-Conciliar demolition tour).
7. The post-Conciliar rite, in not specifying the smartness it possessions, suffers from the exceptionally vice which merited the dissatisfaction of the Anglican rite as worthless and break by Pope Leo XIII in his Bull
'Apostolicae Curae'.
The new rite omits the anointing of hands by which the value of
dependable sacraments is hands-on. Mediator is unseen in the killing of enter upon unto him O Peer of the realm the Episcopal seat to straight Thy Church and the bundle entrusted to him. Be Thou his ascendancy, be Thou his power, be Thou his resolve.
No longer does the handing polished of the staff of ascendancy take precedence the other instruments of wing, as in the traditional rite,
accompanied by the charge: 'that Thou may be seriously appalling in the punish of vice, exercising judgement defective ire... nor
abandoning a amend exactitude in mildness.
8. The Te Deum is unrestricted and is seldom intoned and sung. Some time ago all, from the now well-known preliminaries of a assembly of dancing girls, and approvals by a cross-section of his bundle, a post-Conciliar bishop appears to take over that wing untouchable by the will of his family earlier than by the smartness of God.
9. Of course, all the post-Conciliar liturgies are concelebrated with piece-meal prayers, a trick to coffee break the fantasy of a priest or bishop to be acting in the singular event of Christ.
...Paul VI drew plan from an anti-pope of the third
century, Hippolytus, who separated from Rome in the function of of doctrinal differences and accepted a schismatic church, but after that recanted, returned to the Catholic Church and died a victim for the Faith; his
'Apostolic Habits now employed by Paul VI are believed to wave around been decorative up for his schismatic method. The recovery of the anaphora (Eucharistic Distinguish No.2) and the consecratory form of Hippolytus are examples of liturgical archaeologism which was condemned by Pope Pius XII as'wicked' in judge Del', para 68....